Anonymous: a face record with no claim on it
An anonymous person verifies without giving any identity. We recognize them by the device ID: no phone, no email, no name. That is the right shape for one-off anonymous flows, but the recognition is only as durable as the browser it lives in:- Clear the browser, switch devices, or open a private window, and the person looks brand new. Their face record is still there, but they have no way to claim it, so a fresh attempt can collide with their own earlier verification and come back denied.
- Anonymous records do not live forever. Stale entries are cleaned up over time, which frees people who got stuck, at the cost that anonymous people re-verify more often.
Bound identity: a claim they can assert anywhere
A bound identity is a verified phone or email tied to the person’s face record, optionally linked to your own record via an external id. Ownership is always proven with a one-time code during the flow; there is no way to skip it. The identity is the claim. When that person shows up on a new device, their face is recognized as one that carries a claim, and instead of a dead-end collision the flow asks them to sign in with their number or email. One code later the claim is re-asserted, the new device is linked, and they are through. New browser, cleared cookies, a year later: same human, same uniqueness, no starting over.Identity in the flow
The email or phone plays several roles, all controlled by the verification’s identity configuration in the dashboard:- How it is collected.
anonymousskips identity entirely.collectionhas the person enter their own email or phone in the flow.providedmeans your server supplies it at initialize, and the person cannot swap it for a different one. - Whether you receive it. Identity sharing controls whether the verified email or phone is returned on the confirmation. Off by default: we prove ownership without exposing the value.
- Whether it is exclusive. Identity lock holds each face to one identity within your company. The same face coming back with a different email or phone is reported as an
identity_mismatch.
Which to use
Bind an identity
Returning people, anything you will re-verify, or when you already know
them (link phone or email plus an external id). A durable claim to their
uniqueness, minimal repeat friction.
Stay anonymous
One-off, no-login flows, such as a single collection form or a one-time
gate, where you hold no identity and do not need the person to come back.
This is a product decision more than a code one: the same hosted flow handles
both. You steer toward a bound identity with the identity mode on your
verification, or by binding a phone, email, or external id at
initialize. With nothing bound and
identity optional, the person continues anonymous.